California Proposes Stricter Measures Against Clear at Airports

Travel through airports is about to change for Californians if a new bill passes. The proposed legislation targets the popular service “Clear” which many frequent flyers have come to rely on. However, some feel the perks it provides create an unfair two-tier system at security. With its ability to let members skip to the front of the line with just a scan, complaints have emerged that “Clear” separates flyers into haves and have-nots.

The bill proposes hitting pause on further expansion of “Clear” within the state for now. It does not aim to eliminate the service but rather aims to make the airport experience more equal for people of all income levels. With tax dollars funding security, some argue it shouldn’t be dependent on how much one can pay. Under the proposed changes, “Clear” would have dedicated lanes rather than using the existing TSA lines.

A Step Toward Fairness Or An Overreach?

Naturally, the proposal has garnered strong reactions on both sides of the issue. Supporters see it as addressing a real inequality at airports. However, others argue “Clear” provides a valued service and generates revenue for airports. Travelers who use “Clear” also point out they help reduce security wait times for all. Only time will tell if the moratorium will pass but the debate highlights an ongoing challenge to balance business interests with passenger fairness.

As air travel demand resurges after the pandemic, airport experiences are under scrutiny. This bill could impact the future of “Clear” in the state. But more importantly, it has sparked a discussion around prioritizing equal access and limiting privileges based on ability to pay within our publicly funded transportation systems. How California decides to handle this issue may shape policies nationwide going forward.