UNC Implements ‘Race Consideration Ban’ in Hiring and Admissions After Supreme Court Loss

In the wake of a Supreme Court defeat, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) has implemented a ‘race consideration ban’ in its admissions and hiring processes. The university’s board of trustees has clarified that application essays or any other means cannot be used to consider race. This ‘UNC race consideration ban’ is a direct response to the university’s recent Supreme Court loss.

Details of the ‘UNC Race Consideration Ban’ Resolution

The board adopted a resolution stating, “the University shall not unlawfully discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity.

Or national origin, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, disability, genetic information, or veteran status in its admissions, hiring and contracting.” This ‘UNC race consideration ban’ resolution is a significant change in the university’s policy.

The resolution quotes Chief Justice John Roberts’s opinion forbidding universities from instituting the regime declared unlawful by the Court by other means.

Board chair David Boliek Jr. confirmed that these changes took effect immediately. Despite the ‘UNC race ban’, the university will still accept essays that discuss race.

However, admissions officers at UNC are expect to read these essays in a colorblind fashion. This ‘UNC race consideration ban’ has significant implications for the university’s admissions and hiring processes.

Dissenting Voices Against the Ban

Since the June decision, there has been a discussion of how the opinion would be apply practically. Groups opposed to affirmative action have written to universities. Warning them to comply with the decision fully and not use proxies for race.

The ‘UNC consideration ban’ has sparked debate about the scope of the ruling outside of admissions. Some argue that the decision also applies to faculty hiring and law-review membership in those institutions. The ‘UNC consideration ban’ has stirred up a lot of public interest and debate.

The resolution did not pass unanimously. Trustee Ralph Meekins Sr. voted against it, saying that the board went beyond what the Supreme Court said in its June ruling. Particularly in applying the resolution to hiring university employees.

Meekins wanted the board to consult the university’s legal team before acting. His dissent raises questions about the extent and application of the ‘UNC race consideration ban’.

The ‘UNC race consideration ban’ is likely to have far-reaching effects on the university’s hiring and admissions processes. It remains to be seen how the university will navigate this new policy while still striving for diversity and inclusion.

The ‘UNC race consideration ban’ is a significant development in the ongoing debate about race consideration in university admissions and hiring.